cubbi
Mobile application for in-office meal ordering and delivery
Launched Service / UX/UI Design
Two redesign concepts for Plant Jammer's AI-powered ingredient substitution experience
Solo Project
UX/UI Design
2 weeks
Figma, UsabilityHub
My entry for UX Design Contest #16
Lower-than-expected user-engagement with the current ingredient substitution experience
Enable users to search and filter recipes based on ingredients, incorporating a dropdown menu for ingredient substitutions
I conducted a round of testing before redesigning the product to uncover any potential usability issues with the current design
I identified the following issues during the usability test and prioritized them based on their urgency:
I developed two redesign concepts for Plant Jammer aimed at addressing these usability issues
Usability issue: Mobile compatibility.
Solution: Implemented a layout adjustment to display two recipes per row, reducing the need for excessive scrolling while browsing recipes on mobile devices.
Usability issue: Absence of search and filter functionalities.
Solution: Introduced a feature allowing users to search recipes by ingredient(s) and filter them based on allergies and dietary preferences.
Usability issue: Monotonous visual design and confusing replacement button.
Solution: Realistic and recognizable icons were introduced to represent ingredients. Additionally, the original replacement button was replaced with horizontal scrolling, streamlining user experience by minimizing unnecessary clicks.
Usability issues: Monotonous visual design and confusing replacement button.
Solution: Implement drop-down menus, a common interface pattern used in e-commerce, familiar to the average user, to enhance clarity and ease of use.
I conducted two tests to validate these redesign concepts for ingredient substitution experiences
I conducted usability tests on UsabilityHub to assess the discoverability of the ingredient substitution function in two redesigned interfaces by analyzing participant clicking behavior to determine where they would click to replace a specific ingredient.
After comparing the results from the first click tests conducted on both redesigns, it's evident that users find the ingredient substitution function in redesign 2 more user-friendly to navigate.
I conducted a preference test involving the current design and two redesigned versions to evaluate their relative preferences. Among 32 participants from 13 countries, the results were as follows:
"Easy to read."
"Able to see the amount the best."
"I can see the ingredients, the layout seems more organized."
"Looks the best and it’s minimalist."
Simple and organized not overwhelming."
"The ingredient options are visible and the use of illustrations helps easier identification."
"I can see the ingredients more clearly than the other options."
"Seems more attractive and dynamic than the others, makes the app look fresher in my humble opinion."
"It's uniform."
"I can clearly see the ingredients an the amount needed."
"Because it looks similar to what I am used to."
Key Lessons from this Project:
Develop design systems that resonate with a broad audience, drawing on commonly recognized patterns from popular applications and websites.
Prioritize intuitive interaction patterns to cater to users with varying levels of technological proficiency. Avoid complex interfaces and streamline designs to minimize distractions and enhance usability.